A holder count is not a distribution.
So this board leads with how far the top five vary from each other, and it re-measures it in front of you rather than quoting itself.
Nothing is graded here and nothing is an opinion. It is a standard deviation over a mean, taken from two public RPC calls anybody can run.
Every token on the board, ranked by evenness.
Two RPC calls. One number.
Why the top five
A distribution script funds a handful of wallets in one pass, and it funds them with the same number. That signature dies as you go deeper into the holder list, where real buyers with real sizes drown it out. Five is deep enough to catch the pattern and shallow enough that the pattern is still legible.
A top-ten percentage adds those same five balances together and reports the total. Addition destroys exactly the information that matters: five wallets holding 17,010,004 each and five wallets holding 40M, 18M, 12M, 9M and 4M sum to nearly the same figure. One of them is a script. The percentage cannot tell you which.
What the number cannot do
It cannot tell you a token is a scam, and it is not trying to. A team can distribute unevenly on purpose and a genuine launch can land evenly by accident. A low reading is a question, not a verdict.
It also cannot see through wallets that were funded at different times or in different amounts on purpose. Anyone who knows this metric exists can defeat it in an afternoon. That is fine — it costs them the convenience of the one-pass script, which is the whole point.
What it does do is refuse to hide behind an aggregate. It shows you five numbers and the spread between them, and then you look at the numbers yourself.
mean (μ) → 17,010,004
deviation from mean → 0 for every wallet
σ → 0 · CV → 0.00% · PLACED